European dis-Enlightenment: Canard Cuisine
Thursday, April 29th, 2010What is it about the otherwise rational and wonderful French culture that drives their love of wacko conspiracy theories? The French obsession with canards obviously goes beyond cooking! Although I admit that I love the French and their culture, I am especially perplexed by the moon hoax and NASA-obsessed wackos in France.
Alas, reliance on pseudoscience and references to spiritualism, the occult, conspiracy theories, and other anti-Enlightenment lines of thought will always captivate a certain segment of the population in every country. Moreover, as the sometimes clever Yes Men often prove, the tentacles of irrationality and gullibility can sometimes work past the usual social safety nets (e.g., the usual safeguards provided by education, opportunity, etc.). Aaron Sorkin once wonderfully summed it all up by writing a line for a character who said something like, “We now live in a nightmare world that if it were a film, would be titled The Revenge of the Hacks!” I agree.
It used to be that hacks and wackos were limited to yelling at street corners or distributing leaflets. The number leaflets they could push into passerby hands was, thankfully, usually limited by the number of nickels that people might plink into a tin cup out of pity (or in hopes of having them move on). Now, however, wackos have a global audience, their misaligned thoughts captured in orderly electron arrays for the ages.
I assert that over the last two decades, media popularization and exploitation of anti-Enlightenment thought is on the rise around the world. Anti-Enlightenment thought is certainly not confined to America. My personal observation–and as we develop this site over the next few years, we will post some archival examples from our work travels–is that mysticism and other forms of anti-Enlightenment thought still abounds (sometimes even within scientific circles) in Europe, Russia, China, and developed parts of India and Asia.
Large parts of Australia also seem lost.
Print, film, cable, and broadcast editors who have the editorial responsibilities and capacity to review and control the dissemination of wacko and hack material should be flogged when they deliberately use or exploit such content. As I have long argued, James Brooks wonderfully insightful1980s film Broadcast News predicted the inevitable decline to news as entertainment (and subject to the economic and profit drives thereof) that have created the current state of news noise. Although they can be infuriating, I understand the hacks and wackos, but what I don’t understand are news editors sincerely promoting the disturbed. For example, with regard to NASA, not only are the conspiracy theories absurd, they are also insulting to the tens of thousands of men and women who devoted (and sometimes sacrificed) their lives in the exploration of space.
At a minimum, can’t we simply label and consign specious content as entertaining “odd bits.”
Accordingly, we hereby establish such a LernerMedia Journal category.
Alas, the truth is that it is often not the ignorant who are to be feared. It is the semi-knowledgeable pseudoscholars who cause the most damage to honest studies. A recent thread by Gavin and the other excellent scientists at Real Climate discusses another prominent and maddening example of this anti-Enlightenment, pseudoscience/conspiracy infatuation in France (See http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/04/claude-allegre-the-climate-imposter ).
Because the media is always looking for a new angle, hype and hysteria often garner more attention than substance. As a result, scholarship is shunned and sensational distortions or half-truths are too easily and too often taken as gospel.
Cheers,
Lee
Bonnieux, France
April, 2010



Another great product from Cincopa 




